<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toronto Hydro MuniFi Disruption redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remarkk.com/2006/03/22/toronto-hydro-munifi-disruption-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remarkk.com/2006/03/22/toronto-hydro-munifi-disruption-redux/</link>
	<description>OPEN creative communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 03:40:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kuznicki</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2006/03/22/toronto-hydro-munifi-disruption-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kuznicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2006/03/22/toronto-hydro-munifi-disruption-redux/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hanna,

Thanks for the comment.  I&#039;m interested in raising the profile of the net-neutrality and digital divide issues, and this municipal wifi development provides an opportunity.  Thanks too for the link to Catch da Flava.  Too bad there&#039;s no RSS feed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hanna,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  I&#8217;m interested in raising the profile of the net-neutrality and digital divide issues, and this municipal wifi development provides an opportunity.  Thanks too for the link to Catch da Flava.  Too bad there&#8217;s no RSS feed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanna</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2006/03/22/toronto-hydro-munifi-disruption-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>hanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2006/03/22/toronto-hydro-munifi-disruption-redux/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>hi mark,

nicely put - 2 things...

1) &quot;A picture is presenting itself of a dormant fibre optic network that has the potential to access almost every telephone pole and/or lamp-post in Southern Ontario.&quot;

Indeed. but i don&#039;t think that will be for quite awhile.  For example, I&#039;ve noticed that news coverage of the planned wifi rollout keeps inching away from the original June intro, and is now hovering around Sept.  I won&#039;t speculate as to why this is, since there are myriad reasons (red tape, technical snafus, etc.) but I wouldn&#039;t strike the possibility of some incumbent strong-arminng.  

It&#039;s refreshing to see the &quot;public utility&quot; debate finally hit Canada.  It&#039;s been years in the making over in the U.S. (but they&#039;ve got bigger issues with broadband...)
But the timing couldn&#039;t be better - the TPRP call for liberalization of the telecom market dovetails nicely with the recent Hydro announcement, and it&#039;s heartening to see public interest over this hold steady.


2) &quot;Any Regent Park bloggers out there?&quot; 
yep.  http://focus.civiblog.org/blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi mark,</p>
<p>nicely put &#8211; 2 things&#8230;</p>
<p>1) &#8220;A picture is presenting itself of a dormant fibre optic network that has the potential to access almost every telephone pole and/or lamp-post in Southern Ontario.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed. but i don&#8217;t think that will be for quite awhile.  For example, I&#8217;ve noticed that news coverage of the planned wifi rollout keeps inching away from the original June intro, and is now hovering around Sept.  I won&#8217;t speculate as to why this is, since there are myriad reasons (red tape, technical snafus, etc.) but I wouldn&#8217;t strike the possibility of some incumbent strong-arminng.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s refreshing to see the &#8220;public utility&#8221; debate finally hit Canada.  It&#8217;s been years in the making over in the U.S. (but they&#8217;ve got bigger issues with broadband&#8230;)<br />
But the timing couldn&#8217;t be better &#8211; the TPRP call for liberalization of the telecom market dovetails nicely with the recent Hydro announcement, and it&#8217;s heartening to see public interest over this hold steady.</p>
<p>2) &#8220;Any Regent Park bloggers out there?&#8221;<br />
yep.  <a href="http://focus.civiblog.org/blog" rel="nofollow">http://focus.civiblog.org/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remarkk! &#187; [Geist]: Canada&#8217;s Telecom Policy Review</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2006/03/22/toronto-hydro-munifi-disruption-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Remarkk! &#187; [Geist]: Canada&#8217;s Telecom Policy Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2006/03/22/toronto-hydro-munifi-disruption-redux/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] Is it time to consider broadband a public utility? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is it time to consider broadband a public utility? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
