<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada Worse than 3rd World Countries when it comes to Mobile Data Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/</link>
	<description>OPEN creative communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:29:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: angryman</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/comment-page-1/#comment-108870</link>
		<dc:creator>angryman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/#comment-108870</guid>
		<description>I just got a SMS from Rogers that they going to apply long-distance rates on top of my current air time rate to all long-distance incoming calls.
This is just ridicules. 
In Canada we have worse mobile service in the world and this is not a joke. Most developing countries have lower price rate for much better quality mobile service. I will vote for anyone on next election who can promise that we will have the mobile service provider that can deliver high quality service with a reasonable price rate. There is no one country in Europe has so high price rate and so pure quality!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got a SMS from Rogers that they going to apply long-distance rates on top of my current air time rate to all long-distance incoming calls.<br />
This is just ridicules.<br />
In Canada we have worse mobile service in the world and this is not a joke. Most developing countries have lower price rate for much better quality mobile service. I will vote for anyone on next election who can promise that we will have the mobile service provider that can deliver high quality service with a reasonable price rate. There is no one country in Europe has so high price rate and so pure quality!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kuznicki</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/comment-page-1/#comment-56107</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kuznicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/#comment-56107</guid>
		<description>Canticle thanks for the comment.  You will note that: 1. The graph and the calculations were created by Tom Purves, not I.  2. That this data is now seven months old and I know for one that the Bell unlimited plan did not exist (or at least not published) at the time.

I recommend that you leave your comments on Tom&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;original post&lt;/a&gt; or on his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/09/18/updates-on-data-rates/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent update&lt;/a&gt;, and encourage him to update his graph with the latest information.  It would also be great if you could provide Tom with links to the specific plans you describe.

Don&#039;t you love the fact that we have the technology to have this conversation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canticle thanks for the comment.  You will note that: 1. The graph and the calculations were created by Tom Purves, not I.  2. That this data is now seven months old and I know for one that the Bell unlimited plan did not exist (or at least not published) at the time.</p>
<p>I recommend that you leave your comments on Tom&#8217;s <a href="http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/" rel="nofollow">original post</a> or on his <a href="http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/09/18/updates-on-data-rates/" rel="nofollow">recent update</a>, and encourage him to update his graph with the latest information.  It would also be great if you could provide Tom with links to the specific plans you describe.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you love the fact that we have the technology to have this conversation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canticle</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/comment-page-1/#comment-55859</link>
		<dc:creator>Canticle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/#comment-55859</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m calling you out. I checked the links for all three providers for their data plans, and your numbers are completely, utterly, flat out wrong.

You make claims for rates that simply don&#039;t exist anywhere in their pricing plan. All three providers offer 1 Gig Data/Voice plans for $100 or lower a month. Bell offers an unlimited data monthly option under $100 a month.

If you&#039;re going to go on a crusade, get your numbers right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m calling you out. I checked the links for all three providers for their data plans, and your numbers are completely, utterly, flat out wrong.</p>
<p>You make claims for rates that simply don&#8217;t exist anywhere in their pricing plan. All three providers offer 1 Gig Data/Voice plans for $100 or lower a month. Bell offers an unlimited data monthly option under $100 a month.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to go on a crusade, get your numbers right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arieh Singer</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/comment-page-1/#comment-13819</link>
		<dc:creator>Arieh Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/#comment-13819</guid>
		<description>Hey Mark,  Caught this from Sameer&#039;s RSS (read it before yours, sorry), and posted an article detailing my carrier experiences over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onedegree.ca/2007/04/10/canadian-mobile-carries-come-under-fire&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OneDegree.ca&lt;/a&gt;.
Cheers mate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mark,  Caught this from Sameer&#8217;s RSS (read it before yours, sorry), and posted an article detailing my carrier experiences over at <a href="http://www.onedegree.ca/2007/04/10/canadian-mobile-carries-come-under-fire" rel="nofollow">OneDegree.ca</a>.<br />
Cheers mate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eloquation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Travesty of Canadian Mobile Data Rates</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/comment-page-1/#comment-13760</link>
		<dc:creator>Eloquation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Travesty of Canadian Mobile Data Rates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/#comment-13760</guid>
		<description>[...] but the sentiment is the right one. For more information, check out Thomas&#8217; post. Thanks to Mark for sending this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but the sentiment is the right one. For more information, check out Thomas&#8217; post. Thanks to Mark for sending this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
