<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Failed strategy connects Afghan fields, city streets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remarkk.com/2007/12/07/failed-strategy-connects-afghan-fields-city-streets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/12/07/failed-strategy-connects-afghan-fields-city-streets/</link>
	<description>OPEN creative communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 03:40:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan Jayasekera</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/12/07/failed-strategy-connects-afghan-fields-city-streets/comment-page-1/#comment-86027</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Jayasekera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2007/12/07/failed-strategy-connects-afghan-fields-city-streets/#comment-86027</guid>
		<description>My political motto is &#8220;Right-wing means for left-wing ends&#8221;.  For instance, if you want there to be food for all, don&#039;t interfere with free markets in agriculture; instead just ensure that everyone has enough money to buy food.

Unfortunately the established &quot;wing&quot; terminology lumps things together that aren&#039;t necessarily linked, e.g. left-wing governments are assumed to be fiscally irresponsible, but in western Canadian provincial politics it&#039;s often been the NDP (socialist) parties that were the fiscally responsible ones, while their opponents were all too willing to put the government into heavy debt.

So there is no relevant Wikipedia page for my ideology (if that&#039;s what it is) &#8212; but you can see the Energy Probe Research Foundation&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eprf.ca/eprf/about.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The 10 principles that guide us&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s written with an environmentalist orientation, but applies much more broadly than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My political motto is &ldquo;Right-wing means for left-wing ends&rdquo;.  For instance, if you want there to be food for all, don&#8217;t interfere with free markets in agriculture; instead just ensure that everyone has enough money to buy food.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the established &#8220;wing&#8221; terminology lumps things together that aren&#8217;t necessarily linked, e.g. left-wing governments are assumed to be fiscally irresponsible, but in western Canadian provincial politics it&#8217;s often been the NDP (socialist) parties that were the fiscally responsible ones, while their opponents were all too willing to put the government into heavy debt.</p>
<p>So there is no relevant Wikipedia page for my ideology (if that&#8217;s what it is) &mdash; but you can see the Energy Probe Research Foundation&#8217;s <a href="http://www.eprf.ca/eprf/about.html" rel="nofollow">The 10 principles that guide us</a>.  It&#8217;s written with an environmentalist orientation, but applies much more broadly than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Fung</title>
		<link>http://remarkk.com/2007/12/07/failed-strategy-connects-afghan-fields-city-streets/comment-page-1/#comment-78300</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Fung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkk.com/2007/12/07/failed-strategy-connects-afghan-fields-city-streets/#comment-78300</guid>
		<description>I saw an interesting definition of non-authority (as opposed to anti-authority) in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007690.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article at WorldChanging&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m with you on the ideology bit. Some of what I&#039;ve been reading for my research has been very enlightening in this regard. It basically says that whatever comes next must necessarily model a pluralism that is inclusive of all forms of political participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw an interesting definition of non-authority (as opposed to anti-authority) in <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007690.html" rel="nofollow">this article at WorldChanging</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on the ideology bit. Some of what I&#8217;ve been reading for my research has been very enlightening in this regard. It basically says that whatever comes next must necessarily model a pluralism that is inclusive of all forms of political participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
